SURABAYA – The prestigious Kebun Binatang Surabaya (KBS)—one of Indonesia’s oldest and most iconic zoological institutions—has been plunged into a deep crisis. Following a rigorous investigation by the East Java High Prosecutor’s Office (Kejati Jatim), former President Director Choirul Anwar (CA) has been officially named a suspect in a massive corruption scandal involving the embezzlement of animal feed funds and operational budgets totaling IDR 10.2 billion.

The revelation has sent shockwaves through the Surabaya administration, exposing a long-standing pattern of financial irregularities that allegedly spanned nearly a decade. As authorities move to hold those responsible accountable, the city government has pledged full cooperation to ensure transparency and the restoration of the zoo’s operational integrity.


The Core Allegations: A Breach of Trust

The corruption case centers on the systematic misappropriation of funds designated for the welfare of the animals housed at the Surabaya Zoo. According to the investigation led by the East Java High Prosecutor’s Office, the embezzlement occurred over an eight-year period, from 2016 to 2024.

Aspidsus (Assistant for Special Crimes) of the East Java High Prosecutor’s Office, I Gede Punia, confirmed that the decision to name CA a suspect was based on strong preliminary evidence. "We have identified unauthorized cash disbursements between 2023 and 2024. These fraudulent expenditures were not only executed but also approved by the then-Director of Finance, acting under the direction of the President Director," Punia stated during a press conference at the Kejati Jatim headquarters.

The financial chicanery effectively hollowed out the zoo’s operational budget, leading to visible signs of neglect within the facility. Reports from the field indicate that during the period of the alleged embezzlement, many animals were found in an emaciated state, and maintenance of enclosures had severely deteriorated, sparking public outcry even before the legal investigation reached its climax.


Chronology of the Investigation: From Suspicion to Indictment

The downfall of the former management did not happen overnight. It was the result of a methodical auditing process initiated by the Surabaya City Government under the leadership of Mayor Eri Cahyadi.

The Initial Red Flags

Suspicion began to mount when financial reports revealed persistent discrepancies. Mayor Eri Cahyadi disclosed that the city government had been monitoring the situation closely, noting that the irregularities dated back several years, even preceding his own tenure as Mayor.

The Audit Process (2024)

In 2024, the Surabaya administration took decisive action by commissioning an independent audit. Unlike internal reviews, this audit was conducted by a team recommended by the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK). The findings were damning: approximately IDR 8 billion in cash was missing from the accounts. Subsequent investigations by the Prosecutor’s Office expanded the scope of the losses to IDR 10.2 billion.

Legal Action

Following the submission of the audit findings to the Kejati Jatim, investigators moved to freeze accounts, interview staff, and scrutinize thousands of pages of financial ledgers. On July 22, 2026, the investigation culminated in the official naming of CA as a suspect, marking a pivotal moment in the legal proceedings against the former zoo leadership.


Official Response: "Sing Salah Ya Seleh"

Surabaya Mayor Eri Cahyadi has maintained a firm stance throughout the ordeal. In a press conference at the Surabaya City Hall, he emphasized that the administration would not shield anyone involved in the scandal, regardless of their position.

"This serves as a clear message: sing salah ya seleh (those who are wrong must be removed/held accountable)," Eri declared. He underscored that his administration had been transparent about the irregularities since they were first identified.

Eri explained that the financial discrepancies were a systemic issue that had persisted for years. "The financial reports showed balances in the books, but the actual cash was missing. This was a pattern that existed from the era of Ibu Tri Rismaharini through to my term. We decided to open everything up to the public so that there would be no suspicion or cover-ups," the Mayor added.

The Mayor further highlighted that the audit of the Surabaya Zoo was part of a broader crackdown on corruption within city-owned enterprises (BUMD). He pointed to similar audits currently being conducted at the PD Pasar (Municipal Market) as evidence of his administration’s commitment to cleaning up public institutions.


The Human and Animal Cost

Beyond the cold statistics of IDR 10.2 billion, the human and animal cost of this corruption is profound. The Surabaya Zoo is a public trust, intended to serve as a center for conservation, education, and recreation.

Neglect of Welfare

The embezzlement directly impacted the quality of life for the zoo’s inhabitants. With funds meant for high-quality nutrition and medical supplies being diverted, animal health became a secondary priority. Observers noted that during the peak of the embezzlement period, the physical condition of several iconic species had visibly declined.

Deterioration of Infrastructure

The financial drain also halted necessary repairs to animal habitats. Enclosures that required constant maintenance for safety and sanitation were left to decay, leading to an environment that was increasingly unsuitable for both the animals and the visiting public.


Implications for Public Governance

The scandal involving Choirul Anwar serves as a cautionary tale for municipal management in Indonesia. It highlights several critical governance challenges:

  1. The Failure of Internal Oversight: The fact that these irregularities persisted for years suggests that internal monitoring mechanisms were either bypassed or intentionally ignored by previous management.
  2. The Necessity of Independent Audits: The success of the Surabaya government in uncovering the fraud underscores the importance of utilizing independent, BPK-recommended auditors to bypass potential conflicts of interest within local government agencies.
  3. Public Accountability: By openly admitting to the financial gaps and supporting the Prosecutor’s Office, the Surabaya government has attempted to maintain public trust. This transparency is vital for the long-term survival of public-private partnerships like the Surabaya Zoo.

Future Outlook: Restoring the Surabaya Zoo

As the legal case against Choirul Anwar proceeds through the courts, the focus for the Surabaya City Government now shifts to stabilization and reconstruction.

Administrative Reform

Mayor Eri Cahyadi has indicated that the management structure of the zoo will undergo a complete overhaul. The goal is to install leadership that is not only professionally competent but also strictly adherent to financial transparency protocols.

Investment in Animal Welfare

Moving forward, the city has promised to reallocate funds to modernize the zoo’s infrastructure and upgrade its veterinary facilities. The administration aims to restore the institution’s reputation as a world-class conservation center.

The Legal Path Forward

The Kejati Jatim has signaled that the investigation may widen. Investigators are currently looking into whether other parties—including external vendors or additional staff members—were complicit in the approval of the "unauthorized cash disbursements." The trial of CA is expected to reveal more details regarding the web of corruption that allowed for the systematic looting of the zoo’s coffers.

Conclusion

The corruption case at the Surabaya Zoo is a stark reminder of the corrosive nature of financial malpractice. What began as a mismanagement of public funds evolved into a betrayal of the city’s environmental and ethical responsibilities. As the legal system takes its course, the citizens of Surabaya remain hopeful that this dark chapter will lead to a more robust, honest, and animal-friendly future for their beloved zoo. The message from City Hall is clear: in the pursuit of good governance, there is no room for those who profit at the expense of public trust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *